ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2025
Novelty versus innovation of gene regulatory elements in human evolution and disease.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lineage-specific evolution of regulatory landscapes in a polyploid plant and its diploid progenitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From duplication to divergence: Single-cell insights into transcriptional and cis-regulatory landscapes in soybean.The Plant cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is not currently understood how much of human evolution is due to modifying existing functional elements in the genome versus forging novel elements from nonfunctional DNA. Many early experiments that aimed to assign genetic changes on the human lineage to their resulting phenotypic change have focused on mutations that modify existing elements. However, a number of recent studies have highlighted the potential ease and importance of forging novel gene regulatory elements from nonfunctional sequences on the human lineage. In this review, we distinguish gene regulatory element novelty from innovation. We propose definitions for these terms and emphasize their importance in studying the genetic basis of human uniqueness. We discuss why the forging of novel regulatory elements may have been less emphasized during the previous decades, and why novel regulatory elements are likely to play a significant role in both human adaptation and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.