Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592109›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2025

Adverse Outcomes Associated with Progressive Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

Minhazur R Sarker, Dana Canfield, Lauren Ferrara, Gladys A Ramos, Chelsea A DeBolt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minhazur R SarkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-3023
Dana CanfieldDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Lauren FerraraDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai Health System and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Gladys A RamosDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Chelsea A DeBoltDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai Health System and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9532-4109

Funding

TRAINING IN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCEST32HD007203 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAMELA L MELLON · 1988 to 2026
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007203NIH HHS T32 HD007203-42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the association between increasing bile acid levels in pregnancies with cholestasis and adverse outcomes.This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous gestations complicated by cholestasis delivered at a single academic medical center from 2005 to 2019. We compared rates of adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by mild cholestasis (initial total bile acid [TBA] <40 μmol/L and peak TBA <40 μmol/L), progressive cholestasis (initial TBA <40 μmol/L and peak TBA ≥40 μmol/L), and severe cholestasis (initial TBA ≥40 μmol/L). Our primary outcome was a composite adverse outcome including spontaneous preterm labor and delivery, umbilical artery pH <7.20, 5-minute Apgar <7, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Analyses were performed using mild cholestasis as the base comparator and a second analysis using severe cholestasis as the base comparator.Of the 1,182 pregnancies complicated by cholestasis, 732 (61.9%) had mild cholestasis, 78 (6.6%) had progressive cholestasis, and 372 (31.5%) had severe cholestasis. After adjusting for confounders including gestational age at diagnosis and using mild cholestasis as the base comparator, both progressive and severe cholestasis were associated with the composite adverse outcome (progressive intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP], OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.04-2.78 and severe ICP, OR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.24-2.06). When using progressive cholestasis as the base comparator, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between progressive cholestasis and severe cholestasis.This study highlights the significance of monitoring peak bile acid levels and that some cases of cholestasis may progress in pregnancy and the adverse associations are better reflected by the peak TBA level and not the cholestasis severity at initial diagnosis. · Outcomes with worsening cholestasis severity (progressive) are unknown.. · Retrospective study comparing mild to progressive to severe cholestasis.. · Progressive cholestasis outcomes are more similar to severe cholestasis.. · Clinical utility of trending bile acids warrants further study..

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsCholestasis, IntrahepaticPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeAdultApgar ScoreCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancyPremature BirthRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBile Acids and Salts

Identifiers

PMID39592109
PMCPMC12185769

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.