ArticleNature communications2024
Brain age prediction and deviations from normative trajectories in the neonatal connectome.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Accelerated brain aging in methamphetamine use disorder revealed by functional connectivity.National science review · 2026Article
- Regional brain age is decreased in children with sickle cell anemia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Aperiodic parameters of the fMRI power spectrum associate with preterm birth and neonatal age.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Integrating single-cell RNA sequencing and artificial intelligence for multitargeted drug design for combating resistance in liver cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural and functional connectomes undergo rapid changes during the third trimester and the first month of postnatal life. Despite progress, our understanding of the developmental trajectories of the connectome in the perinatal period remains incomplete. Brain age prediction uses machine learning to estimate the brain's maturity relative to normative data. The difference between the individual's predicted and chronological age-or brain age gap (BAG)-represents the deviation from these normative trajectories. Here, we assess brain age prediction and BAGs using structural and functional connectomes for infants in the first month of life. We use resting-state fMRI and DTI data from 611 infants (174 preterm; 437 term) from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) and connectome-based predictive modeling to predict postmenstrual age (PMA). Structural and functional connectomes accurately predict PMA for term and preterm infants. Predicted ages from each modality are correlated. At the network level, nearly all canonical brain networks-even putatively later developing ones-generate accurate PMA prediction. Additionally, BAGs are associated with perinatal exposures and toddler behavioral outcomes. Overall, our results underscore the importance of normative modeling and deviations from these models during the perinatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.