ReviewPediatric research2025
Prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone in neonates born extremely preterm: current knowledge and future challenges.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07248761 (Efficacy of Early Administration of Hydrocortisone in Shock in Preterm Neonates of Less Than 1,500 g), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Early Administration of Hydrocortisone in Shock in Preterm Neonates of Less Than 1,500 g
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the real-world effects of prophylactic hydrocortisone in the Canadian Neonatal Network: A cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Comment on "Umbilical Artery Leucine-Rich α-2 Glycoprotein as a Predictor of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants".Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
- Postnatal Steroids in Preterm Infants: A Narrative Review Series-Part 3: Impacts on Growth, Neurodevelopment & Nutrition.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stress exposure, stress responses, and short-term outcomes in very preterm neonates: a national cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Elevation of corticosterone and 17OH progesterone in extremely preterm infants and clinical implications.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal modelling of growth in neonates exposed to antenatal steroids to quantify associations with final height: a cohort study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prophylactic administration of low-dose hydrocortisone, at replacement dosage, targets inability of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) to respond to postnatal stress due to adrenal glands immaturity and is intended to prevent serious complications such as death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Increasing evidence from systematic reviews shows that prophylactic hydrocortisone reduces pre-discharge mortality, improves survival without BPD, favors patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure, and may have beneficial effects on cardiovascular stability and urine output. In contrast, an increased risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation when prophylactic hydrocortisone is combined with indomethacin and late-onset sepsis, particularly in infants of 24-25 weeks of gestation, have been reported as major adverse events. No significant negative impact on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes following prophylactic hydrocortisone exposure was observed. Recent real-world data, despite their intrinsic methodological limitations, generally confirm the benefits observed in clinical trials, even with additional potential benefits and without increased adverse events. Ongoing challenges and questions discussed in this invited review relate to the best population to treat, optimal timing and duration of treatment, and potential barriers to implementation due to evolving knowledge and guidelines. IMPACT STATEMENT: Prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone improves survival without BPD in infants born extremely preterm. Recent real-world data generally confirm the benefits observed in clinical trials, even with additional potential benefits and without increased adverse events. Unanswered questions remain about optimal timing and duration of treatment, and potential barriers to implementation due to evolving knowledge and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.