ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute cardiology and neurology services in a secondary peripheral hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operating in recurrent crises: a qualitative study of decision-making and unintended consequences in a peripheral hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Heart vs. Brain in a Warzone: The Effects of War on Acute Cardiovascular and Neurological Emergencies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical services in peripheral hospitals has not been fully described. We compared the impact of COVID-19 on Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management and outcome in an Israeli peripheral hospital. We included 1029 CVA and 495 STEMI patients. Patients who arrived during (15/3/2020-15/4/2022) and before (1/1/2018-14/3/2020) the pandemic, were demographically comparable. During the pandemic, median time for CVA patients from arrival to imaging was longer (23 vs. 19 min, p = 0.001); timing from arrival to tissue Plasminogen Activator administration was similar (49 vs. 45 min, p = 0.61); transfer to another hospital was more common (20.3% vs. 14.4% p = 0.01) and median length of stay (LOS) was shorter (3 vs. 4 days, p < 0.05). Among STEMI patients, median time from arrival to intervention intra- pandemic was shorter (45 vs. 50 min p = 0.02); Mean LOS shorter (3.86 vs. 4.48 p = 0.01), and unplanned re-admission less frequent (7.8% vs. 14.6% p = 0.01). Mortality did not change significantly. Our data shows no major negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CVA outcomes, and improved care for STEMI patients. Interviews with the neurology and cardiology staff are performed to investigate how quality of care was maintained during the crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.