ArticleScientific reports2024
No enhancement of vestibular stimulation on visual working memory for actions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Holding and processing actions in visual working memory (VWM) is crucial for daily functioning, but it is capacity-limited. The vestibular system, which is activated by both vestibular signals and visual gravitational motion, may be involved in this cognitive process. Past research indicates that galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a non-invasive technique that can enhance motor functions and various cognitive functions. However, the impact of GVS on VWM for actions has not been explored. This study addresses this gap by investigating whether GVS can improve VWM capacity for both upright and inverted actions. Using a virtual reality platform, we assessed VWM capacity in a change detection task, applying either STIM-current (0.8 mA) or SHAM-current (0 mA) GVS. The results showed no significant effect of GVS on VWM for either upright or inverted actions, at least for non-noisy GVS with stimulation intensity below cutaneous threshold. Despite the absence of significant effects, this study provides valuable insights into the interactions between the vestibular system and cognitive processes, laying the groundwork for future research on GVS applications in cognitive enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.