Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593169›Full record

ArticleBiomarker research2024

Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis for sensitive disease monitoring and detection of relapse in neuroblastoma.

Ida Rahmqvist, Enya Engström, Elisabeth Mellström, Raghda R Ibrahim, Fani Pujol-Calderón, Agnes Dahlstrand Rudin, Anna Ordqvist Redfors, Niki Rostamzadeh, Rita Di Rienzo, Wilma Franssila and 12 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ida Rahmqvist *Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Enya Engström *Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elisabeth MellströmSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Raghda R IbrahimSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Fani Pujol-CalderónSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Agnes Dahlstrand RudinSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna Ordqvist RedforsDepartment of Pediatrics, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Niki RostamzadehSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rita Di RienzoSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Wilma FranssilaSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Robert KhashanSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Moe XylanderSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christin KarlssonSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Torben EkChildren's Cancer Cancer Centre, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Daniel AnderssonSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tobias ÖsterlundWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jennie GaarderDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henrik FagmanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Susanne FranssonDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tommy MartinssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders StåhlbergWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Martin DalinSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. martin.dalin@gu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown potential as a non-invasive tumor biomarker in neuroblastoma. Previous studies used generic assays for detection of selected predefined oncogenic variants as markers of ctDNA, which limits the sensitivity and excludes a subset of patients from analysis. Here we assessed patient-specific ctDNA analysis for treatment evaluation and detection of relapse in neuroblastoma. We generated personalized sequencing panels targeting 10 tumor-specific single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for each patient and performed ctDNA analysis of 136 plasma samples collected longitudinally in 13 children with neuroblastoma. ctDNA was detected using ultra-deep next generation sequencing with unique molecular identifiers to eliminate polymerase-induced errors. We found that the levels of ctDNA at diagnosis correlated with risk group and decreased gradually during effective treatment. All samples collected during follow-up in patients without disease relapse were ctDNA-negative. All four relapses were associated with elevated ctDNA levels, and a majority of the analyzed SNVs were detected at time of relapse. In one case, ctDNA became positive 78 days before the relapse was diagnosed with routine assessment and increased by over a thousandfold before the start of additional treatment. Overall, ctDNA was more uniformly elevated at diagnosis, showed less putative false positive results, and was more sensitive for detection of relapse compared to five serum or urine tumor markers used in clinical routine. In conclusion, personalized ctDNA analysis is suitable for clinical monitoring of tumor burden and may be used in all neuroblastoma patients regardless of risk group or tumor genetics.

Indexed as

Circulating tumor DNALiquid biopsyNeuroblastomaPediatric cancerPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID39593169
PMCPMC11600567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.