ArticleBiomarker research2024
Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis for sensitive disease monitoring and detection of relapse in neuroblastoma.
Article in Biomarker research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Precision Medicine in Neuroblastoma: Targeted Therapies and Personalized Approaches-A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Detection of Targetable Genetic Abnormalities in Neuroblastoma Circulating Tumour DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown potential as a non-invasive tumor biomarker in neuroblastoma. Previous studies used generic assays for detection of selected predefined oncogenic variants as markers of ctDNA, which limits the sensitivity and excludes a subset of patients from analysis. Here we assessed patient-specific ctDNA analysis for treatment evaluation and detection of relapse in neuroblastoma. We generated personalized sequencing panels targeting 10 tumor-specific single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for each patient and performed ctDNA analysis of 136 plasma samples collected longitudinally in 13 children with neuroblastoma. ctDNA was detected using ultra-deep next generation sequencing with unique molecular identifiers to eliminate polymerase-induced errors. We found that the levels of ctDNA at diagnosis correlated with risk group and decreased gradually during effective treatment. All samples collected during follow-up in patients without disease relapse were ctDNA-negative. All four relapses were associated with elevated ctDNA levels, and a majority of the analyzed SNVs were detected at time of relapse. In one case, ctDNA became positive 78 days before the relapse was diagnosed with routine assessment and increased by over a thousandfold before the start of additional treatment. Overall, ctDNA was more uniformly elevated at diagnosis, showed less putative false positive results, and was more sensitive for detection of relapse compared to five serum or urine tumor markers used in clinical routine. In conclusion, personalized ctDNA analysis is suitable for clinical monitoring of tumor burden and may be used in all neuroblastoma patients regardless of risk group or tumor genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.