Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593787›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Performance Assessment of an Electrostatic Filter-Diverter Stent Cerebrovascular Protection Device: Evaluation of a Range of Potential Electrostatic Fields Focusing on Small Particles.

Beatriz Eguzkitza, José A Navia, Guillaume Houzeaux, Constantine Butakoff, Mariano Vázquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatriz EguzkitzaBarcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3302-6667
José A NaviaCardiac Surgery Service Department, University Hospital, Austral University, Pilar B1630FHB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillaume HouzeauxBarcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2592-1426
Constantine ButakoffELEM Biotech SL, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Mariano VázquezBarcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silent Brain Infarction (SBI) is increasingly recognized in patients with cardiac conditions, particularly Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in elderly patients and those undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). While these infarcts often go unnoticed due to a lack of acute symptoms, they are associated with a threefold increase in stroke risk and are considered a precursor to ischemic stroke. Moreover, accumulating evidence suggests that SBI may contribute to the development of dementia, depression, and cognitive decline, particularly in the elderly population. The burden of SBI is substantial, with studies showing that up to 11 million Americans may experience a silent stroke annually. In AF patients, silent brain infarcts are common and can lead to progressive brain damage, even in those receiving anticoagulation therapy. The use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) during TAVI has been explored to mitigate the risk of stroke; however, their efficacy remains under debate. Despite advancements in TAVI technology, cerebrovascular events, including silent brain lesions, continue to pose significant challenges, underscoring the need for improved preventive strategies and therapeutic approaches. We propose a device consisting of a strut structure placed at the base of the treated artery to model the potential risk of cerebral embolisms caused by atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, or dislodged debris of varying potential TAVI patients. The study has been carried out in two stages. Both are based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) coupled with the Lagrangian particle tracking method. The first stage of the work evaluates a variety of strut thicknesses and inter-strut spacings, contrasting with the device-free baseline geometry. The analysis is carried out by imposing flow rate waveforms characteristic of healthy and AF patients. Boundary conditions are calibrated to reproduce physiological flow rates and pressures in a patient's aortic arch. In the second stage, the optimal geometric design from the first stage was employed, with the addition of lateral struts to prevent the filtration of particles and electronegatively charged strut surfaces, studying the effect of electrical forces on the clots if they are considered charged. Flowrate boundary conditions were used to emulate both healthy and AF conditions. Results from numerical simulations coming from the first stage indicate that the device blocks particles of sizes larger than the inter-strut spacing. It was found that lateral strut space had the highest impact on efficacy. Based on the results of the second stage, deploying the electronegatively charged device in all three aortic arch arteries, the number of particles entering these arteries was reduced on average by 62.6% and 51.2%, for the healthy and diseased models respectively, matching or surpassing current oral anticoagulant efficacy. In conclusion, the device demonstrated a two-fold mechanism for filtering emboli: (1) while the smallest particles are deflected by electrostatic repulsion, avoiding micro embolisms, which could lead to cognitive impairment, the largest ones are mechanically filtered since they cannot fit in between the struts, effectively blocking the full range of particle sizes analyzed in this study. The device presented in this manuscript offers an anticoagulant-free method to prevent stroke and SBIs, imperative given the growing population of AF and elderly patients.

Indexed as

aortic archatrial fibrillationcerebroembolic protection devicescomputational fluid dynamics modeling (CFD)electrical repulsionparticle flow simulationsilent brain infarctsstrokeTAVR

Identifiers

PMID39593787
PMCPMC11592227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.