Evidence mapPaperPMID 39594592Full record

ReviewCells2024

Does Incretin Agonism Have Sustainable Efficacy?

Sok-Ja Janket, Miyo K Chatanaka, Dorsa Sohaei, Faleh Tamimi, Jukka H Meurman, Eleftherios P Diamandis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sok-Ja JanketRetired Research Associate Professor, Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Miyo K ChatanakaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-8315
Dorsa SohaeiM.D., C.M. Candidate 2026, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A QT2, Canada.
Faleh TamimiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Jukka H MeurmanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6702-6836
Eleftherios P DiamandisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5T 3L9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical trials using synthetic incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have demonstrated that these treatments ameliorated many complications related to obesity, emphasizing the significant impact of body weight on overall health. Incretins are enteroendocrine hormones secreted by gut endothelial cells triggered by nutrient ingestion. The phenomenon that oral ingestion of glucose elicits a much higher insulin secretion than intra-venous injection of equimolar glucose is known as the incretin effect. This also alludes to the thesis that food intake is the root cause of insulin resistance. Synthetic GLP-1 and GIP agonists have demonstrated unprecedented glucoregulation and body weight reduction. Also, randomized trials have shown their ability to prevent complications of obesity, including development of diabetes from prediabetes, reducing cardiovascular disease risks and renal complications in diabetic patients. Moreover, the benefits of these agonists persist among the patients who are already on metformin or insulin. The ultimate question is "Are these benefits of incretin agonism sustainable?" Chronic agonism of pancreatic β-cells may decrease the number of receptors and cause β-cell exhaustion, leading to β-cell failure. Unfortunately, the long-term effects of these drugs are unknown at the present because the longest duration in randomized trials is 3 years. Additionally, manipulation of the neurohormonal axis to control satiety and food intake may hinder the long-term sustainability of these treatments. In this review, we will discuss the incretins' mechanism of action, challenges, and future directions. We will briefly review other molecules involved in glucose homeostasis such as amylin and glucagon. Amylin is co-expressed with insulin from the pancreas β-cells but does not have insulinotropic function. Amylin suppresses glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying and suppressing the reward center in the central nervous system, leading to weight loss. However, amylin can self-aggregate and cause serious cytotoxicity and may cause β-cell apoptosis. Glucagon is secreted by pancreatic α-cells and participates in glucose homeostasis in a glucose-dependent manner. In hypoglycemia, glucagon increases the blood glucose level by glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis and inhibits glycogenesis in the liver. Several triple agonists, in combination with dual incretins and glucagon, are being developed.

Indexed as

IncretinsAnimalsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansInsulin-Secreting CellsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Incretinsagouti-related peptide (AgRP)GABAergic neuronsglucagon-like peptide 1glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptideneuropeptide Y (NPY)proopiomelanocortin (POMC)satiety

Identifiers

PMID39594592
PMCPMC11592889

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.