Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594723›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Enhancing Tumor Targeted Therapy: The Role of iRGD Peptide in Advanced Drug Delivery Systems.

Dragana Nikitovic, Ekaterina Kukovyakina, Aikaterini Berdiaki, Alexandros Tzanakakis, Anna Luss, Elizaveta Vlaskina, Anne Yagolovich, Aristides Tsatsakis, Andrey Kuskov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dragana NikitovicDepartment of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-7399
Ekaterina KukovyakinaDepartment of Technology of Chemical Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Products, D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Aikaterini BerdiakiDepartment of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Alexandros TzanakakisSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Anna LussDepartment of Technology of Chemical Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Products, D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta VlaskinaDepartment of Technology of Chemical Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Products, D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-4441-9706
Anne YagolovichFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Aristides TsatsakisForensic Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3824-2462
Andrey KuskovDepartment of Technology of Chemical Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Products, D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-2754

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-15-00468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy remains the primary therapeutic approach in treating cancer. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is the complex network surrounding tumor cells, comprising various cell types, such as immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, as well as ECM components, blood vessels, and signaling molecules. The often stiff and dense network of the TME interacts dynamically with tumor cells, influencing cancer growth, immune response, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. The effectiveness of the treatment of solid tumors is frequently reduced due to the poor penetration of the drug, which leads to attaining concentrations below the therapeutic levels at the site. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) present a promising approach that improves the internalization of therapeutic agents. CPPs, which are short amino acid sequences, exhibit a high ability to pass cell membranes, enabling them to deliver drugs efficiently with minimal toxicity. Specifically, the iRGD peptide, a member of CPPs, is notable for its capacity to deeply penetrate tumor tissues by binding simultaneously integrins ανβ3/ανβ5 and neuropilin receptors. Indeed, ανβ3/ανβ5 integrins are characteristically expressed by tumor cells, which allows the iRGD peptide to home onto tumor cells. Notably, the respective dual-receptor targeting mechanism considerably increases the permeability of blood vessels in tumors, enabling an efficient delivery of co-administered drugs or nanoparticles into the tumor mass. Therefore, the iRGD peptide facilitates deeper drug penetration and improves the efficacy of co-administered therapies. Distinctively, we will focus on the iRGD mechanism of action, drug delivery systems and their application, and deliberate future perspectives in developing iRGD-conjugated therapeutics. In summary, this review discusses the potential of iRGD in overcoming barriers to drug delivery in cancer to maximize treatment efficiency while minimizing side effects.

Indexed as

cancer therapycell-penetrating peptides (CPPs)iRGDnanocarrierstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39594723
PMCPMC11592346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.