Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594835›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Sequential Use of Sorafenib and Regorafenib in Hepatocellular Cancer Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes.

Mehmet Fatih Ozbay, Hakan Harputluoglu, Mustafa Karaca, Omer Tekin, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Muhammed Ali Kaplan, Berksoy Sahin, Caglayan Geredeli, Fatih Teker, Deniz Tural and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mehmet Fatih OzbayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kırsehir Training and Research Hospital, Kirsehir 40200, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3883-4364
Hakan HarputluogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8537-5941
Mustafa KaracaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey.
Omer TekinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-4305
Mehmet Ali Nahit ŞendurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-6139
Muhammed Ali KaplanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey.
Berksoy SahinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey.
Caglayan GeredeliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34098, Turkey.
Fatih TekerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27410, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-6587
Deniz TuralDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34147, Turkey.
Sezer SaglamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Demiroglu Bilim University Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-5792
Timuçin ÇilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Adana 01230, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-1479
Ahmet BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.
Cihan ErolDepartment of Medical Oncology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3155-8798
Ziya KalkanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7858-8180
Ertugrul BayramDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-7613
Oguzhan SelviDepartment of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34098, Turkey.
İlkay GültürkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34147, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1998-3150
Sema Sezgin GöksuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey.
Ali Murat TatlıDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDuring liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence remains a critical challenge for patient survival. Targeted therapies, such as sorafenib and regorafenib, have been utilized to manage relapsed HCC in this unique setting. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Sorafenib and Regorafenib in patients with HCC who experienced recurrence after liver transplantation. We focused on survival outcomes, treatment responses, and the management of side effects in this patient group.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 73 patients who experienced HCC recurrence post-liver transplantation between 2012 and 2022 across 11 oncology centers in Turkey. Patients were categorized according to Child-Pugh classification and treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy and Regorafenib in case of progression. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

resultsOf the 73 patients included in the study, 62 were male (84.9%), and 11 were female (15.1%), with a mean age of 61.5 ± 10.9 years. All patients received sorafenib as first-line treatment. Among patients who experienced progression with sorafenib or discontinued treatment due to toxicity, 45.2% (

conclusionsThese results suggest that Sorafenib and Regorafenib treatments offer a survival advantage in patients with relapsed HCC post-transplantation. However, individualized treatment strategies and close follow-up are crucial for optimizing outcomes. Further studies are needed to refine therapeutic protocols and enhance the care of this specific patient group.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)liver transplantationpost-transplant recurrenceregorafenibsorafenib

Identifiers

PMID39594835
PMCPMC11592833

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.