ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Predictive Model for Perinatal Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Based on Early Birth Data.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveIt is difficult to predict perinatal brain injury, and performing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on suspected injury remains a clinical challenge. Therefore, we aimed to develop a reliable method for predicting perinatal brain injury using a machine learning model with early birth data.
methodsNeonates admitted to our institution from January 2017 to June 2024 with a gestational age of ≥36 weeks, a birth weight of ≥1800 g, admission within 6 h of birth, and who underwent brain MRI to confirm perinatal brain injury were included. Various machine learning models, including gradient boosting, were trained using early birth data to predict perinatal brain injury. Synthetic minority over-sampling and adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN) were applied to address class imbalance. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, and ROC curves. Feature importance scores and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were also calculated.
resultsAmong 179 neonates, 39 had perinatal brain injury. There were significant differences between the injury and non-injury groups in mode of delivery, Apgar scores, capillary pH, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and whether therapeutic hypothermia was performed. The gradient boosting model with the ADASYN method achieved the best performance. In terms of feature importance scores, the 1 min Apgar score was the most influential predictor. Additionally, SHAP analysis showed that LDH levels had the highest SHAP values.
conclusionthe gradient boosting model with ADASYN oversampling effectively predicts perinatal brain injury, potentially improving early detection for predicting long-term outcomes, reducing unnecessary MRI scans, and lowering healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.