ArticleBiomedicines2024
Rituximab Administration to Treat Nephrotic Syndrome in Children: 2-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current status and research hotspots of pediatric nephrotic syndrome: a bibliometric analysis (2011-2025).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- [Efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Advances in SRNS Gene Research: From Precision Classification to Precision Diagnosis and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSteroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) significantly affect children's quality of life. There are frequent relapses in SSNS and progression in SRNS. IPNA guidelines suggest that monoclonal antibodies like rituximab (RTX) are promising treatments.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab administration in children with SSNS, encompassing FRNS and SDNS, and SRNS over a two-year follow-up period, facilitating individualized management.
methodsWe conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized, and patient-oriented study (RICHNESS), involving children aged 3-18 with SRNS (18) and SSNS (11) undergoing 2 years continuous RTX therapy. The primary outcome was complete/partial remission (CR/PR), as defined by IPNA/KDIGO guidelines, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months on RTX; secondary outcomes included adverse events. Key endpoints included the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), CD20 levels, IgG levels, and the incidence of infections. Kidney biopsies were performed in 94% of SRNS patients. RTX was administered every 6-9 months, depending on CD20 levels, IgG levels, and the presence of infections. The eGFR and ACR were assessed every 6 months.
resultsSome 31 children were selected for RTX treatment. Overall, 2 experienced severe allergic reactions, leading to their exclusion from the final analysis of 29 children. In the SSNS group, all children achieved and maintained complete remission within 2 years. Remission rates in the SRNS group ranged from 39% (RR 0.78; 95% CI: 16.4-61.4%, NNT 9) at the 6th month to 72% (RR 1.44; 95% CI: 51.5-92.9%) over the 2-year follow-up period due to continuous RTX therapy. The median duration of RTX use was 26.1 months, with a median cumulative dose of 1820 mg/m
conclusionsRTX was tolerated well, and proved highly effective as a steroid-sparing agent, offering potential in terms of stopping relapses and minimizing steroid-related side effects. It also demonstrated efficacy in slowing progression in SRNS, indicating potential for use in ACR reduction and renal function restoration, but requires careful use given potential severe allergic reactions and infectious complications. Further studies should focus on long-term cost-effectiveness and deferred side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.