ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Level of Necrosis in Feline Mammary Tumors: How to Quantify, Why and for What Purpose?
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inside the Tumor: Decoding the Feline Mammary Tumor Microenvironment and Its Prognostic Value-A Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Feline Mammary Tumors: A Comprehensive Review of Histological Classification Schemes, Grading Systems, and Prognostic Factors.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Prognostic Insights in Feline Mammary Carcinomas: Clinicopathological Factors and the Proposal of a New Staging System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Necrosis is a common finding in human and animal neoplasms. The percentage of tumor necrosis is included in tumor grading schemes in veterinary oncology; however, evaluation methods are often overlooked. Different studies have assessed the prognostic value of tumor necrosis in feline mammary tumors with contradictory results, which could be related to methodologic variability. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of tumor necrosis in feline mammary tumors (FMTs) was conducted, by applying a semi-quantitative and a quantitative methodology for assessing necrosis. The interobserver agreement, the relationship with clinicopathological characteristics and the prognostic value of necrosis were analyzed in 154 FMT cases. Although subjectivity in the assessment of necrosis existed, an almost perfect agreement (weighted quadratic k = 0.851) between two observers was obtained. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between the semi-quantitative and quantitative methods. Necrosis was more common and more extensive in malignant tumors than in their benign counterparts. Despite the non-significant results in the survival analysis, extensive necrosis was significantly associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, such as higher histological grade, high mitotic count and lymphovascular invasion. Our results support the potential relevance of necrosis in FMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.