ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Dementia and Video Games: Systematic and Bibliographic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Virtual and Augmented Reality Games in Dementia Care: Systematic and Bibliographic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis systematic and bibliographic review examines publications in the field of dementia and video game research from 2004 to 2023. The main objective is to assess developments and trends in video game technology for dementia care and detection.
methodsThe PubMed database was the primary source for publications. PRISMA guidelines were applied to structure this review. Ten variables were defined, investigated, and split into three main categories: bibliographic, medical, and technical.
resultsThe results were synthesized using a quantitative approach to reduce bias through interpretation. Of 209 initial results, 77 publications have been included in the investigation. More studies focus on rehabilitation over assessment and detection of dementia. Clinical trials are typically conducted with limited participants. The most populated trials rarely enrol over 300 subjects. On average, around 38 subjects were enrolled in the trials. These studies are commonly supervised by a trainer or technology specialist, suggesting a technology gap in familiarity in the trial demographic.
conclusionsMost interventions assessed were custom-designed applications with a specific outcome, focusing on physical activity and cognitive exercises. As the first of its kind, this publication focuses on the technical aspects of applied technologies and development methods. Using video games to treat and detect patients with cognitive impairments like dementia can benefit healthcare professionals, caretakers, and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.