ArticleBiomolecules2024
Deep-Learning-Based Segmentation of Cells and Analysis (DL-SCAN).
Article in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in mass spectrometry-based analysis of traditional Chinese medicine: compound identification and metabolic pathway elucidation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Integrated subcellular localization of functional fluorescence probes and functional analysis in motile spermatozoa by an AI-enhanced algorithm.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Article
- Morphological and Optical Characterization of NRAS-Mutant Melanoma Cells and Primary Melanocytes via Quantitative Phase Imaging With Digital Holographic Microscopy.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the recent surge in the development of highly selective probes, fluorescence microscopy has become one of the most widely used approaches to studying cellular properties and signaling in living cells and tissues. Traditionally, microscopy image analysis heavily relies on manufacturer-supplied software, which often demands extensive training and lacks automation capabilities for handling diverse datasets. A critical challenge arises if the fluorophores employed exhibit low brightness and a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Consequently, manual intervention may become a necessity, introducing variability in the analysis outcomes even for identical samples when analyzed by different users. This leads to the incorporation of blinded analysis, which ensures that the outcome is free from user bias to a certain extent but is extremely time-consuming. To overcome these issues, we developed a tool called DL-SCAN that automatically segments and analyzes fluorophore-stained regions of interest such as cell bodies in fluorescence microscopy images using deep learning. We demonstrate the program's ability to automate cell identification and study cellular ion dynamics using synthetic image stacks with varying SNR. This is followed by its application to experimental Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.