ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Sensitive Detection of Gynecological Cancer Recurrence Using Circulating Tumor DNA and Digital PCR: A Comparative Study with Serum Biochemical Markers.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dyslipidaemia and hepatic steatosis: mechanisms and implications for lipid-lowering therapy.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of recurrences in gynecological cancers is crucial for women's health. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis through liquid biopsy offers a promising approach for monitoring disease progression and identifying relapses. This study investigated the utility of digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) for ctDNA detection in three gynecological cancer patients with clinically confirmed relapses during a two-year post-surgical follow-up. Patient-specific tumor mutations were identified through whole-exome sequencing (WES) and confirmed via Sanger sequencing. dPCR probes targeting these mutations were used to quantify the ctDNA levels in plasma samples collected throughout the follow-up period, and the findings were compared with standard serum biochemical markers. In two patients, persistent positive dPCR signals for the selected mutations were detected after tumor removal, with ctDNA levels progressively increasing even after post-surgical chemotherapy. Notably, dPCR identified elevated ctDNA levels before an increase in the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) biochemical marker was observed. In the third patient, no ctDNA signals from the two selected mutations were detected despite clinical evidence of recurrence, suggesting the emergence of new mutations. While this study highlights the promise of dPCR for early recurrence detection in gynecological cancers, it also underscores the critical need for comprehensive mutation panels to overcome the inherent challenges posed by tumor heterogeneity and the emergence of new mutations during disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.