ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Evaluation of Biochemical Characteristics and Performance of the 3 Screen ICA ELISA Kit.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Portrait of Autoantigens in Type 1 Diabetes.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a fundamental evaluation of the 3 Screen ICA ELISA kit, which can simultaneously measure three major anti-islet autoantibodies important in diagnosing and predicting type 1 diabetes, to assess its usefulness as a measuring reagent. In autoantibody-positive samples, the coefficient of variation for intra-assay variation ranged from 1.37% to 2.50%, inter-assay variation from 2.81% to 3.61%, and lot-to-lot variation from 2.01% to 8.61%, demonstrating good reproducibility. Additionally, interfering substances did not affect the autoantibody titers, and satisfying performance was observed in tests examining the sample freeze-thaw stability. Notably, even when the titer of GAD autoantibodies was below the cut-off value of the GAD autoantibody ELISA, the 3 Screen ICA signal was completely absorbed by recombinant GAD65 protein, indicating that the detection sensitivity for GAD autoantibody in the 3 Screen ICA ELISA is higher than that of the GAD autoantibody ELISA kit. Furthermore, in a study using IASP2020 samples from the Immunology and Diabetes Society, which aims to standardize anti-islet autoantibody assays, this kit achieved excellent results with a sensitivity of 96.0%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 98.57%. Measuring multiple anti-islet autoantibodies in combination is crucial for diagnosing and predicting type 1 diabetes. The ELISA kit used in this study is highly versatile and can be used in any measurement facility, making it extremely useful for routine testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.