ArticleGenes2024
Comparison of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The characteristics of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of an invasive plantMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chloroplast genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background
methodsIn this study, we sequenced and assembled the complete chloroplast genomes of two endemic Korean plants using Illumina sequencing technology, identified simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and repetitive sequences, and compared them with three previously reported chloroplast genomes.
resultsThe chloroplast genomes of the two species were 156,968 and 57,142 bp in length and had a four-part circular structure. They consisted of a large single-copy region of 87,223 and 87,272 bp and a small single-copy region of 18,167 and 18,138 bp, separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb, 25,789 and 25,866 bp). The genomes contained 130 genes, 49 SSRs, and 49 long repetitive sequences. Comparative analysis with the chloroplast genomes of five
conclusionsThis study provides valuable references for the identification of two endemic Korean
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.