Evidence mapPaperPMID 39596981Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

The Potential Impact of SGLT2-I in Diabetic Foot Prevention: Promising Pathophysiologic Implications, State of the Art, and Future Perspectives-A Narrative Review.

Giuseppe Miceli, Maria Grazia Basso, Andrea Roberta Pennacchio, Elena Cocciola, Chiara Pintus, Mariagiovanna Cuffaro, Martina Profita, Giuliana Rizzo, Mariachiara Sferruzza, Antonino Tuttolomondo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe MiceliDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-2523
Maria Grazia BassoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Andrea Roberta PennacchioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0782-9922
Elena CocciolaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-8863
Chiara PintusDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Mariagiovanna CuffaroDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Martina ProfitaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Giuliana RizzoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Mariachiara SferruzzaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonino TuttolomondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-7318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of diabetic foot (DF) on the healthcare system represents a major public health problem, leading to a considerable clinical and economic burden. The factors contributing to DF's development and progression are strongly interconnected, including metabolic causes, neuropathy, arteriopathy, and inflammatory changes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i), novel oral hypoglycemic drugs used as an adjunct to standard treatment, have recently changed the pharmacological management of diabetes. Nevertheless, data about the risk of limb amputation, discordant and limited to canagliflozin, which is currently avoided in the case of peripheral artery disease, have potentially discouraged the design of specific studies targeting DF. There is good evidence for the single immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, and beneficial vascular effects of SGLT2-i. Still, there is no clinical evidence about the early use of SGLT2-i in diabetic foot due to the lack of longitudinal and prospective studies proving the effect of these drugs without confounders. This narrative review aims to discuss the main evidence about the impact of SGLT2-i on the three complications of diabetes implicated in the development of DF, the state of the art, and the potential future implications.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitorsatherosclerosisdiabetic footneuropathyPADSGLT2-i

Identifiers

PMID39596981
PMCPMC11596194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.