ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Approaches to Pediatric Chest Pain: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Hospital Admission and Cardiac Diagnosis in Children Presenting with Chest Pain: The Role of Recurrent Presentation and Inflammatory Markers.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Particular Aspects of Cardiac Rhythm Disorders in Symptomatic Children and Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Incidence, Diagnoses, and Outcomes of Pediatric Nontraumatic Chest Pain Attended by Ambulance.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Utility of Troponin in Predicting Cardiac Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Monitoring Beta-Blocker Therapy in Adolescents with Exercise-Induced Intraventricular Gradients Using Exercise Stress Echocardiography.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- False Troponin Elevation in Pediatric Patients: A Long-Term Biochemical Conundrum Without Cardiac Effects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Comment on Fogliazza et al. Approaches to Pediatric Chest Pain: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest pain in children and adolescents is a common reason for emergency department visits and referrals to pediatric cardiologists, often driven by parental concern about potential cardiac causes. However, the vast majority of pediatric chest pain cases are benign and non-cardiac in origin. This narrative review examines the etiology, evaluation, and management of pediatric chest pain, emphasizing the importance of a thorough clinical history and physical examination in distinguishing between benign and serious conditions. This review also explores the role of diagnostic tests such as electrocardiograms, chest radiography, and echocardiography, highlighting the need to balance the avoidance of unnecessary tests with the imperative to rule out life-threatening cardiac conditions. Despite the low prevalence of cardiac causes, the variability in diagnostic approaches underscores the need for standardized evaluation algorithms. These could streamline care, reduce unnecessary resource utilization, and minimize anxiety for both patients and their families. Future studies should focus on assessing the effectiveness of such algorithms in improving clinical outcomes and resource management. The findings underscore the importance of a careful, evidence-based approach to the management of pediatric chest pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.