Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39597899›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Biomarkers: Promising Tools Towards the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Myopia.

Varis Ruamviboonsuk, Carla Lanca, Andrzej Grzybowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Varis RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-1729
Carla LancaEscola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (ESTeSL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-787X
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 60-836 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-2391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of myopia, especially high myopia, continues to increase in several parts of the world. Thus, the use of biomarkers for early myopia detection would be highly valuable for clinical practice aiding in the prevention and myopia control management. The identification of biomarkers that can predict the risk of myopia development, severity of myopia, and treatment response are of paramount significance. In this review, we present the current state of research on biomarkers and myopia, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in biomarkers research for myopia. Although myopia biomarkers may have a role as early indicators of myopia or treatment response, the adoption of biomarkers into myopia clinical practice may only be done when tests have high accuracy, are easily measurable, minimally invasive, and acceptable to parents, children, and eye care professionals. Large consortia studies are necessary to validate biomarkers and translate evidence into clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersgenesimagingmetabolitesmyopia

Identifiers

PMID39597899
PMCPMC11594735

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.