ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Mandibular Advancement Devices in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Its Effects on the Cardiovascular System: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy in 182 DISE-Selected Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy and its Impact on Maternal-Fetal Health: A Hidden Threat - Narrative Review.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular complications. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment, hence poor adherence has prompted interest in mandibular advancement devices (MAD) as an alternative. This comprehensive review aimed to explore the effects of MAD therapy on oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial function, and its impact on the cardiovascular risk in OSA patients.
resultsMAD therapy significantly reduces the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), improves serum nitric oxide (NOx) concentrations, reduces oxidative stress markers, and enhances endothelial function. Animal studies indicated that MAD reduces myocardial fibrosis and attenuates inflammatory markers. While both CPAP and MADs improve endothelial function and heart rate variability, CPAP is more effective in reducing OSA severity. Nevertheless, MAD has higher compliance, contributing to its positive impact on cardiovascular function. Moreover, CPAP and MADs have similar effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular risk.
conclusionsMAD therapy is an effective alternative to CPAP, particularly for patients with mild to moderate OSA as well as those intolerant to CPAP. It offers significant improvements in endothelial function and oxidative stress. Further studies are needed to assess MAD therapy in comprehensive OSA management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.