Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39597906›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Microcirculation: Current Perspective in Diagnostics, Imaging, and Clinical Applications.

Ugur Aksu, Berna Yavuz-Aksu, Nandu Goswami

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07184476 (Assessment of Microvascular Circulation in the Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07184476 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Microvascular Circulation in the Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patient

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsTetrology of Fallot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ugur AksuBiology Department, Science Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34459, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4134-3136
Berna Yavuz-AksuDuzen Laboratory Group, Biochemistry Section, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Nandu GoswamiGravitational Physiology and Medicine Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, 3810 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-0723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the pivotal role of microcirculation in maintaining tissue oxygenation and waste removal and highlights its significance in various pathological conditions. It delves into the cellular mechanisms underlying hemodynamic coherence, elucidating the roles of the endothelium, glycocalyx, and erythrocytes in sustaining microcirculatory integrity. Furthermore, the review gives comprehensive information about microcirculatory changes observed in cardiac surgery, sepsis, shock, and COVID-19 disease. Through comprehensive exploration, the review underscores the intricate relationship between microcirculation, disease states, and clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of understanding and monitoring microvascular dynamics in critical care settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19hemodynamic coherencemicrocirculationsepsisshocksurgery

Identifiers

PMID39597906
PMCPMC11595220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.