ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development, Analysis, and Determination of Pharmacokinetic Properties of a Solid SMEDDS of Voriconazole for Enhanced Antifungal Therapy.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality by Design-Guided Development of Ketoprofen-Cationic Aspasomes Unlocks the Antifungal Potential of Repurposed Ketoprofen for Topical Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of Microemulsions in Enhancing the Stability of Biopharmaceuticals.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVoriconazole is an antifungal drug, which is classified under Bio-Classification System-II and has low water solubility (0.71 mg/mL) and high permeability. Hardly any endeavors have been made to increase the bioavailability of voriconazole.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a solid SMEDDS (self-microemulsifying drug delivery system) for antifungal activity.
methodsBased on solubility studies of Labrafil-M 1994 CS (oil), Cremophor-RH 40 (a surfactant) and Transcutol-HP (a co-surfactant) were selected as components of the SMEDDS and a pseudo-ternary phase diagram was prepared. Thereafter, the oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant were mixed with altered weight ratios (1:1/1:2/2:1) and evaluated through various in vitro, in vivo analyses.
resultsThe particle size of the optimized formulation was observed to be 19.04 nm and the polydispersity index (PDI) value was found to be 0.162 with steady-state zeta potential. The optimized liquid SMEDDS was converted into a solid SMEDDS. Various adsorbents, such as Aerosil-200, Avicel-PH101, Neusilin-US2, and Neusilin UFL2 were screened to better detect the oil-absorbing capacity and flow properties of the powder. Neusilin UFL2 was selected as an adsorbent due to its better oil-absorbing capacity. DSC, X-ray diffraction, and dissolution studies were carried out to characterize the formulation. Further, the Pharmacokinetic profile was also studied in Wistar rats and the Cmax, tmax, and AUC0→t were calculated. The Cmax and AUC0→t plasma concentration is considerably better for the SMEDDS than for the pure drug and marketed formulation.
conclusionsThis investigation clearly reveals the potential of developing a solid SMEDDS for candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis treatment, with better efficacy as compared to the commercially available marketed formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.