ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Prediction of Early Mortality in Esophageal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastasis Using Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning applications in the detection and treatment of esophageal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Machine learning to predict distant metastasis risk and prognostic analysis in T1-2 esophageal cancer: a study based on the SEER database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for esophageal cancer liver metastases using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with esophageal cancer liver metastasis face a high risk of early mortality, making accurate prediction crucial for guiding clinical decisions. However, effective predictive tools are currently limited. In this study, we used clinicopathological data from 1897 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer liver metastasis between 2010 and 2020, which were sourced from the SEER database. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and seven machine learning models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and support vector machine (SVM), were developed to predict early mortality. The models were evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and F1 scores. Results showed that 40% of patients experienced all-cause early mortality and 38% had cancer-specific early mortality. Key predictors of early mortality included age, location, chemotherapy, and lung metastasis. Among the models, XGBoost performed best in predicting all-cause early mortality, while SVM excelled in predicting cancer-specific early mortality. These findings demonstrate that machine learning models, particularly XGBoost and SVM, can serve as valuable tools for predicting early mortality in patients with esophageal cancer liver metastasis, aiding clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.