ReviewPharmaceutics2024
Principles and Biomedical Applications of Self-Assembled Peptides: Potential Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprogramming Metabolism and Immunity: Nanotechnology's Promise for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Precision Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Smart Antidiabetic Nanomedicine: A Revolutionized Therapeutic Approach for Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Engineered GLP-1R-targeting nanoplatforms: multimodal therapeutics in human diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Applications and prospects of biomaterials in diabetes management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is the most prevalent metabolic disorder worldwide. There have been tremendous efforts to find a safe and prolonged effective therapy for its treatment. Peptide hormones, from certain organisms in the human body, as the pharmaceutical agents, have shown outstanding profiles of efficacy and safety in plasma glucose regulation. Their therapeutic promises have undergone intensive investigations via examining their physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Their major drawback is their short half-life in vivo. To address this challenge, researchers have recently started to apply the state-of-the-art molecular self-assembly on peptide hormones to form nanofibrillar structures, as a smart nanotherapeutic drug delivery technique, to tremendously enhance their prolonged bioactivity in vivo. This revolutionary therapeutic approach would significantly improve patient compliance. First, this review provides a comprehensive summary on the pathophysiology of T2DM, various efforts to treat this chronic disorder, and the limitations and drawbacks of these treatment approaches. Next, this review lays out detailed insights on various aspects of peptide self-assembly: adverse effects, potential applications in nanobiotechnology, thermodynamics and kinetics of the process, as well as the molecular structures of the self-assembled configurations. Furthermore, this review elucidates the recent efforts on applying reversible human-derived peptide self-assembly to generate highly organized smart nanostructured drug formulations known as nanofibrils to regulate and prolong the bioactivity of the human gut hormone peptides in vivo to treat T2DM. Finally, this review highlights the future research directions to advance the knowledge on the state-of-the-art peptide self-assembly process to apply the revolutionary smart nanotherapeutics for treatment of chronic disorders such as T2DM with highly improved patient compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.