Evidence mapPaperPMID 39600145Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025

New cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with advanced cancer - A prospective study comparing MR-proADM, MR-proANP, copeptin, high-sensitivity troponin T and NT-proBNP.

Markus S Anker, Laura C Lück, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Jan Porthun, Sara Hadzibegovic, Alessia Lena, Ursula Wilkenshoff, Pia Weinländer, Ruben Evertz, Matthias Totzeck and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Markus S Anker *Charité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-8555
Laura C Lück *Charité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Muhammad Shahzeb KhanDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jan PorthunCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sara HadzibegovicCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alessia LenaCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ursula WilkenshoffCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pia WeinländerCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ruben EvertzDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Matthias TotzeckDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Amir A MahabadiDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan D AnkerGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lars BullingerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, a partnership between DKFZ and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich KellerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, a partnership between DKFZ and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mahir KarakasGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research, partner site HH/Kiel/HL, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserCharité - University Medicine Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin, and Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Javed Butler *Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stephan von Haehling *Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

German Center for Cardiovascular ResearchGerman Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTraditional cardiovascular (CV) biomarkers (high-sensitivity troponinT [hsTnT] and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) are important to monitor cancer patients' cardiac function and to assess prognosis. Newer CV biomarkers (mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin [MR-proADM], C-terminal pro-arginine vasopressin [copeptin], and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide [MR-proANP]) might outperform traditional biomarkers. METHODS AND

resultsOverall, 442 hospitalized cancer patients without significant CV disease or current infection were enrolled (61 ± 15 years, 52% male, advanced cancer stage: 85%) and concentrations of CV biomarkers were analysed. Differences in echocardiographic, clinical, laboratory parameters were assessed. Patients were followed for up to 69 months for all-cause mortality. In univariable analyses, MR-proADM, hsTnT, copeptin, MR-proANP, and NT-proBNP predicted all-cause mortality. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], C-reactive protein, anti-cancer therapy, reason for hospitalization, cancer stage and type), only MR-proADM remained an independent predictor of mortality (MR-proADM per 1 ln: hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-3.50], p < 0.001). MR-proADM had the highest area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC [95% CI] 0.74 [0.69-0.79]; hsTnT: AUC 0.69; copeptin: AUC 0.66; MR-proANP: AUC 0.63; NT-proBNP: AUC 0.62). Optimal cut-point for mortality prediction with MR-proADM was 0.94 nmol/L (HR 2.43 [95% CI 1.92-3.06], p < 0.001). Patients with MR-proADM >0.94 nmol/L were older, more often had cancer stage IV, showed reduced performance status, eGFR, haemoglobin, diastolic left ventricular function, and elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

conclusionMR-proADM is an independent predictor of mortality in advanced stage, hospitalized cancer patients without significant CV disease or current infection. The optimal MR-proADM cut-point for mortality prediction was 0.94 nmol/L with hazards for mortality being approximately 2.5 times higher. There was a continuous increase in mortality risk with stepwise increase of MR-proADM concentrations. Elevated concentrations of MR-proADM were also associated with reduced performance status and mildly reduced left ventricular diastolic function as well as higher age and more often cancer stage IV.

Indexed as

AdrenomedullinAtrial Natriuretic FactorCardiovascular DiseasesGlycopeptidesNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeoplasmsPeptide FragmentsProtein PrecursorsTroponin TAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAdrenomedullinAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkerscopeptinsGlycopeptidesmid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, humanNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Protein PrecursorsTroponin TCardio‐oncologyCardiovascular biomarkersDiastolic dysfunctionMortalityMR‐proADM

Identifiers

PMID39600145
PMCPMC12260322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.