Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600641›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Adrenal indeterminate nodules: CT-based radiomics analysis of different machine learning models for predicting adrenal metastases in lung cancer patients.

Lixiu Cao, Haoxuan Yang, Huijing Wu, Hongbo Zhong, Haifeng Cai, Yixing Yu, Lei Zhu, Yongliang Liu, Jingwu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An interpretableFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lixiu Cao *Department of Nuclear Medical Imaging, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Haoxuan Yang *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Huijing Wu *Department of Nuclear Medical Imaging, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Hongbo ZhongDepartment of MRI, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Haifeng CaiDepartment of Oncology Surgery, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Yixing YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lei ZhuDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yongliang LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Jingwu LiDepartment of Oncology Surgery, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is a paucity of research using different machine learning algorithms for distinguishing between adrenal metastases and benign tumors in lung cancer patients with adrenal indeterminate nodules based on plain and biphasic-enhanced CT radiomics. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 292 lung cancer patients with adrenal indeterminate nodules (training dataset, 205 (benign, 96; metastases, 109); testing dataset, 87 (benign, 42; metastases, 45)). Radiomics features were extracted from the plain, arterial, and portal CT images, respectively. The independent risk radiomics features selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression (LR) were used to construct the single-phase and combined-phase radiomics models, respectively, by support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and LR. The independent clinical-pathological and radiological risk factors for predicting adrenal metastases selected by using univariate and multivariate LR were used to develop the traditional model. The optimal model was selected by ROC curve, and the models' clinical values were estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: In the testing dataset, all SVM radiomics models showed the best robustness and efficiency, and then RF, LR, and DT models. The combined radiomics model had the best ability in predicting adrenal metastases (AUC=0.938), and then the plain (AUC=0.935), arterial (AUC=0.870), and portal radiomics model (AUC=0.851). Besides, compared to clinical-pathological-radiological model (AUC=0.870), the discriminatory capability of the plain and combined radiomics model were further improved. All radiomics models had good calibration curves and DCA showed the plain and combined radiomics models had more optimal clinical efficacy compared to other models, with the combined radiomics model having the largest net benefit. Conclusions: The combined SVM radiomics model can non-invasively and efficiently predict adrenal metastatic nodules in lung cancer patients. In addition, the plain radiomics model with high predictive performance provides a convenient and accurate new method for patients with contraindications in enhanced CT.

Indexed as

adrenal indeterminate nodulesadrenal metastasesdifferent machine learning algorithmslung cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39600641
PMCPMC11588585

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.