ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Praziquantel and factor H recruitment differentially affect the susceptibility of
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-Derived Terpenes as Emerging Therapeutics Against Schistosomiasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cross-reactivity and localization of Schistosoma mansoni antigen for immunodiagnosis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026Article
- The critical window for host defense: macrophage trogocytosis eliminatesFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- An update on schistosomicide and tumoricide in the future: arachidonic acid.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
- From cercariae to chronic inflammation: understanding schistosome infection and host immune responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schistosomes are highly efficient evaders of human immunity, as evident by their ability to survive in human blood for years. How they protect themselves against the constant attack by a key element of innate immunity, the complement system, has remained unclear. In this study, new light is shed on the interaction between distinct life-cycle stages of Results: We demonstrate that schistosomula, the young stage assumed immediately after cercaria penetration of the skin, are extremely vulnerable towards complement-mediated killing as only 10-20% survive. The survival rate increases to 70% already within 30 minutes and reaches close to 100% within two hours. Pathway-specific complement inhibitors revealed the alternative pathway of complement activation as the main contributor to killing and damage of the schistosomula. Moreover, the complement regulator factor H is recruited by the schistosomula in this early stage to evade killing. Surviving parasites appear fully viable despite the ongoing complement attack, as demonstrated by the deposition of C3 fragments. However, when exposed to the widely used schistocidal drug praziquantel, the vulnerability of 24 h-old schistosomula towards complement-mediated killing is notably increased; no such effect was observed for mefloquine or oxamniquine. Similar to the younger life-cycle stages, adult worms remain under complement attack. C3 fragments were found all over the outer surface (tegument), deposited mostly on the ridges and not on the tubercles. Conclusion: The recruitment of factor H merits more detailed studies that pinpoint the molecules involved and elucidate the novel possibilities to intercept the uncovered immune evasion therapeutically. That praziquantel and complement work in synergy is surprising and may in the future result in enhanced understanding of the drug's mechanism of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.