Evidence mapPaperPMID 39600765Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Arhum Mahmood, Rubela Ray, Shaikh Shams T Bin Salam, Fatima Haque, Jahnavi Akkaldevi, Mohd Diya Masmoum, Mohammad S Hassan, Binish Essani, Tooba Anjum, Muhammad Sohail S Mirza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Psychological Factors and Metacognitive Beliefs in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Single-Group Pre-Post Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arhum MahmoodInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
Rubela RayInternal Medicine, Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital, Bankura, IND.
Shaikh Shams T Bin SalamCardiology, Dr. N. T. Rama Rao (NTR) University of Health Sciences, Mahabubnagar, IND.
Fatima HaqueBiochemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Jahnavi AkkaldeviInternal Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Mohd Diya MasmoumGeneral Practice, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammad S HassanSurgery, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Binish EssaniMedicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.
Tooba AnjumRadiology, Institute Of Nuclear Medicine & Oncology (INMOL) Cancer Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Sohail S MirzaInternal Medicine, Shandong University School Of Medicine, Jinan, CHN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are some of the most common conditions and the major contributors to death and disability globally, hence the need for proper secondary prevention interventions. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have been recognized as an essential component in the treatment of CVDs with the goal of decreasing the risk of new cardiovascular events and improving the quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the impact of CR as a form of CVD treatment on mortality, morbidity, functional capacity, and quality of life amongst the patient population. The search resulted in 12 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, which included both randomized controlled trials as well as cohort studies. The meta-analysis, therefore, showed that the CR program is effective in reducing all-cause mortality (RR=0 74, 95% CI: 0.62-0. Favorable effects of intervention regarding participation measures were found in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains of body functions (pool standardized mean differences (SMD)= 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43-0.68). The results confirm the significance of CR programs as an essential element of secondary prevention of CVDs, stressing the ability of CR to lower mortality rates and improve patients' functional status. Despite this, the implementation of CR programs continues to be suboptimal globally for various healthcare facilities; hence the requirement for interventions to ensure that more patients incorporate the protocols and adapt uniform CR protocols.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcardiac rehabilitation programscardiovascular diseasescardiovascular outcomescoronary artery diseaseheart failuremyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39600765
PMCPMC11588675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.