ArticleCureus2024
Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Sepsis in Term Neonates: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of vitamin D administration on sepsis score and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in preterm infants with neonatal sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Vitamin D and Neonatal Sepsis: Current Evidence, Biological Mechanisms, and Future Directions-A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Neonatal sepsis remains a major global health challenge, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality in term neonates. Despite advancements in neonatal care, the early identification and prevention of sepsis continue to pose challenges. Emerging research suggests that vitamin D, traditionally recognized for its role in bone health, also plays a crucial role in immune regulation. Objectives To evaluate and compare serum vitamin D levels in term neonates with sepsis and without sepsis. Methods The study included 60-term neonates, with 30 neonates diagnosed with sepsis as cases and 30 healthy-term neonates as controls. Detailed history and clinical examination were performed for all subjects. Sepsis was diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory criteria. Serum vitamin D levels were assessed using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) technique. Results The mean serum vitamin D levels in the sepsis group were significantly lower (16.0 ng/mL ± 10.5) compared to the control group (29.07 ng/mL ± 8.4) with a p-value <0.01. There was no significant difference in gender distribution (p=0.79), socioeconomic status (p=0.752), or maternal age (p=0.349) between the groups. Significant differences were found in the mode of delivery (p=0.037), presence of meconium-stained liquor (p=0.001), intrapartum antibiotic administration (p=0.0006), and resuscitation requirements (p=0.0004). APGAR scores at one minute were significantly lower in the sepsis group (p=0.001). Clinical features among sepsis cases included poor activity (40%), tachypnoea (46.6%), tachycardia (43.3%), and hyperthermia (40%). Conclusion A strong association between vitamin D deficiency and the severity of sepsis was observed, with deficient neonates showing higher rates of severe, early-onset sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.