ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2024
Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early in-hospital use of SGLT2i in heart failure patients with ischemic etiology.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: The clinical data of 88 patients with ACS and T2D who were treated with SGLT2i between January 2020 and December 2021 were collected as the case group through convenience sampling. Patients taking other hypoglycaemic drugs were included as the control group in a 1:1 ratio matched with the case group using retrospective propensity score matching. Relevant data were subsequently collected from both groups for comparison. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between the two groups (8.11[6.93, 9.41] vs 7.51[6.52, 9.14]%; Z=2.109; P=0.035). The SGLT2i group showed a decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (P<0.001), secondary composite endpoint events (P=0.024), heart failure readmission (P=0.042) and unplanned revascularisation (P=0.014) compared with the control group. Moreover, the multivariate analysis showed that SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.472; 95% CI, 0.321-0.694; P<0.001) and unplanned revascularisation (HR, 0.422; 95% CI, 0.212-0.842; P=0.014). In patients with reduced ejection fraction, SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of MACEs (HR, 0.258; 95% CI, 0.106-0.626; P=0.003) compared with the control group. By contrast, in patients without reduced ejection fraction, SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of MACEs (HR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.412-0.996; P=0.048) and unplanned revascularisation (HR, 0.464; 95% CI, 0.222-0.969; P=0.041) compared with the control group. Conclusion: In addition to significantly reducing the risk of adverse cardiovascular events and unplanned revascularisation in patients with ACS and T2D, the use of SGLT2i can reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events regardless of the presence of reduced ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.