Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Minimal changes in sleep parameters during overnight ambulatory blood pressure monitoring do not affect outcomes.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the gold standard for assessing blood pressure; however, its use may potentially disrupt sleep. Previous studies have produced mixed results on the impact of ABPM on sleep parameters and used actigraphy as the evaluating tool. To date, no studies have investigated the effects of ABPM on sleep parameters evaluated through polysomnography. PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the effects of ABPM on objectively assessed sleep parameters.
methodsWe evaluated five women and five men (age: 38.0 ± 15.0 years; BMI: 27.0 ± 3.5 kg/m²) using full polysomnography over two nights in a sleep laboratory-one night with ABPM and one night without it, with nocturnal assessments every 30 min. The order of the conditions was randomized, with intervals between nights ranging from 3 to 10 days.
resultsN2 sleep was significantly longer during the night with ABPM compared to the night without it (66.4 ± 12.4% vs. 57.7 ± 11.3%, p < 0.003). Conversely, the apnea-hypopnea index was higher on the night without ABPM (13.1 ± 21.2 vs. 10.5 ± 19.8 events/hour, p < 0.005). Participants did not rate the night with ABPM as worse than the night without, and no significant differences were observed in total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, or time awake after sleep onset.
conclusionsABPM does not appear to adversely affect significant objective sleep parameters or subjective evaluations of sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39601908What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.