SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Sleep apnea prevalence and severity after coronary revascularization versus no intervention: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Approximately 40-80% of cardiovascular disease patients have obstructive sleep apnea. The manifestation of it can vary significantly in different types of CAD patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the prevalence and severity of OSA in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
methodsThis systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The first inclusion criteria were that a reliable sleep study had to be done after treating the patients' acute coronary incident. All patients in the studies included were adults suffering from an ACS who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or had no invasive coronary intervention done. A search was conducted within four valid databases 27.1.2023 and all suitable articles published after 1.1.2010 were included.
resultsEight studies fulfilled the full inclusion criteria. In five of them, a sleep study had been performed after PCI, in two after no coronary intervention, and in one study after CABG. Mean AHI in no-OSA group after PCI was 9.5 /h (95% CI 5.3-13.7) and in the no intervention group 6.4 /h (95% CI 3.5-9.4). In OSA patients, mean AHI after PCI was 34.9 /h (95% CI 25.9-43.8) vs. 24.1 /h without intervention (95% CI 15.6-32.6).
conclusionsSleep apnea is very common among ACS patients and should be screened for and addressed after the acute coronary intervention. Moreover, we found that OSA is more severe in patients in whom PCI for ACS was indicated as opposed to patients who underwent no coronary intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.