ReviewSpine deformity2025
Healthcare disparities in adult and pediatric spinal deformity: a state of the art review.
Review in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single- versus dual-surgeon outcomes in adult and pediatric spinal deformity patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine deformity · 2026Pooled it
- Intersection of race and ethnicity with perceptions of health status and literacy in adult patients with spinal deformity: insights from the all of us research program.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA health disparity refers to a greater disease burden or negative health outcomes influenced by social, economic, and environmental factors. Numerous studies in the surgical literature show that social drivers of health affect health outcomes. Similar disparities may affect treatment and outcomes of spine deformity patients. This study aims to review existing literature on healthcare disparities in patients with spinal deformities.
methodsA comprehensive search of articles from 1/2002 to 7/2024 in two databases included keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms: "health disparities," "scoliosis," "social determinant of health," "disparities," "spine deformity," and "race". The 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria were U.S.-based, English-language, peer-reviewed research covering all age groups. Exclusion criteria excluded studies unrelated to spinal deformity and case reports.
resultsThe search resulted in 22 potential articles investigating health care disparities in spinal deformity patients. Black patients were noted to present with disease progression compared to White patients. Females have a longer length of stay (LOS) than males. The Black and Hispanic patients had longer LOS than Whites. The privately insured patients were more likely to receive timely care than Medicaid recipients.
conclusionThe consensus across much of the literature reviewed indicate that surgeon volume, hospital volume, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status impact patient outcomes in adult and pediatric spinal deformity. Prospective studies and solutions to address these disparities are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39602061What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.