ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in gynecological cancer: the GOTIC-VTE trial.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The multidisciplinary management of a patient with infected iliocaval stents and uterine cancer invasion.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-world data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japanese patients with gynecological cancer are lacking. The GOTIC-VTE trial aimed to evaluate the frequency of VTE-associated events and risk factors at the time of cancer diagnosis and during 1-year follow-up. From July 2017 to February 2019, patients with endometrial, cervical, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who underwent VTE screening within 2 months before registration, were enrolled. Of the 1008 patients enrolled, 881 were included in the analysis set, 51 (5.8%) had VTE at the time of cancer diagnosis (baseline), 7 (0.8%) had symptomatic VTE, and the majority had asymptomatic VTE (n = 44; 5.0%). Patients with ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer had a higher incidence of VTE (13.7%) than those with other cancer types. During the 1-year follow-up, 0.9% (n = 8) of the patients had symptomatic VTE, 3.5% (n = 31) had composite VTE (symptomatic VTE and incidental VTE requiring treatment), 0.2% (n = 2) had bleeding events, and 4.3% (n = 38) had all-cause death, all of which were significantly higher in the VTE group at baseline. In the multivariate analysis, chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for composite VTE during the 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 1.39-13.63, p = 0.018). Among gynecological cancers, VTE incidence is particularly high in ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, and patients undergoing chemotherapy should be cautioned against VTE occurrence during treatment.The GOTIC-VTE trial Unique identifier, jRCTs031180124; Registration date, April 06, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.