Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602157›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2025

Long-Term Aspirin vs Clopidogrel After Coronary Stenting by Bleeding Risk and Procedural Complexity.

Jeehoon Kang, Jaewook Chung, Kyung Woo Park, Jang-Whan Bae, Huijin Lee, Doyeon Hwang, Han-Mo Yang, Kyoo-Rok Han, Keon-Woong Moon, Ung Kim and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02044250 (Comparison of Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond Two Year After Drug-eluting Stent Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02044250 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond Two Year After Drug-eluting Stent Implantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2014 to 2025Enrolled5,530ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsClopidogrel, Aspirin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jeehoon KangSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaewook ChungSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Woo ParkSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jang-Whan BaeChungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Huijin LeeSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Doyeon HwangSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Han-Mo YangSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyoo-Rok HanKangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
Keon-Woong MoonSt Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ung KimYeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Moo-Yong RheeDongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Doo-Il KimHaeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea.
Song-Yi KimJeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
Sung-Yun LeeSeoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Uk LeeKwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Sang-Wook KimChung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong-si, Korea.
Seok Yeon KimSeoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Kyu HanSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Seok ShinUlsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea.
Bon-Kwon KooSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo-Soo KimSeoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Antiplatelet monotherapy in the chronic maintenance period for patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) and those who have undergone complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not yet been explored. Objective: To compare clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy in patients with HBR and/or PCI complexity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc analysis of the multicenter HOST-EXAM Extended study, an open-label trial conducted across 37 sites in South Korea, enrolled patients from 2014 to 2018 with up to 5.9 years of follow-up. The analysis was conducted from February to November 2023. Patients who maintained dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) event-free for 6 to 18 months following PCI were included. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel or aspirin in a 1:1 ratio. Those with sufficient data to assess HBR or complex PCI were analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were thrombotic composite end point (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and definite/probable stent thrombosis) and any bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5). Results: Of 3974 patients included (mean [SD] age, 63.4 [10.7] years; 2976 male [74.9%]), 866 had HBR (21.8%), and 849 underwent complex PCI (21.4%). Clopidogrel as compared with aspirin was associated with lower rates of thrombotic and bleeding events regardless of HBR and/or PCI complexity. For the thrombotic composite end point, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.53-1.04) among HBR vs 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48-0.80) among patients without HBR (P for interaction = 0.38) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.77) among patients with complex PCI vs 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59-0.92) among patients with noncomplex PCI (P for interaction = 0.12). The reduction in bleeding by clopidogrel compared with aspirin was consistent among both patients with HBR (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.21) and patients without HBR (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P for interaction = 0.20) and among patients undergoing complex PCI (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.47-1.33) vs noncomplex PCI (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P for interaction = 0.62). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, in patients who experienced PCI and were event-free during 6 to 18 months of DAPT, the beneficial impact of clopidogrel monotherapy over aspirin monotherapy was consistent, regardless of bleeding risk and/or PCI complexity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02044250.

Indexed as

AspirinClopidogrelCoronary Artery DiseaseHemorrhagePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsStentsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaAspirinClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39602157
PMCPMC12079284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.