Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604177›Full record

ReviewEuropean burn journal2022

Screening and Assessment for Psychological Distress among Burn Survivors.

Valerie G Loehr, William F Goette, Kimberly Roaten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European burn journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Practice guideline for adult burn rehabilitation nursing (2026 edition)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review of PTSD and Depression in Adult Burn Patients: A Call for Standardized Screening and Intervention Research.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valerie G LoehrDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-8898, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0356-8454
William F GoetteDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-8898, USA.
Kimberly RoatenDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-8898, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-0448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the high rates of psychological distress after burn injury, thorough screening and assessment for psychosocial factors and psychiatric pathology should be routinely completed for individuals with burn injuries. Burn survivors experience unique psychosocial changes and injury sequelae, such as body image concerns, trauma-related pathology, and itching. Screening for these factors is integral to understanding how these may be contributing to psychological distress. Proactively identifying distress and psychiatric pathology is important to optimize physical and emotional outcomes. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize information about the available screening and assessment tools for psychological distress among burn survivors.

Indexed as

assessmentburn injurymental health screeningpsychological distresssymptom screeningsymptom severity

Identifiers

PMID39604177
PMCPMC11575395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.