ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Diastolic dysfunction evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived E, a, e': Comparison to echocardiography.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary Vein Flow Indices by MRI for Diastolic Function Evaluation.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Early diastolic dysfunction in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective study on hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- 3D Phase Contrast Using Balanced Steady-State Free Precession (PC-SSFP) for Improved 4D Flow at Clinical Field Strengths.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- CMR-based left atrial strain for predicting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic hypertensive patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Diastolic dysfunction evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived E, a, e': Comparison to echocardiography.Physiological reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the first-line and most useful imaging modality for evaluating diastolic dysfunction (DD). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been fully evaluated for this task. We investigated the utility of CMR for DD evaluation.Thirty-one patients with a recent TTE (within 4 months) were prospectively enrolled, along with 12 healthy age-matched subjects. CMR imaging was performed at 1.5 T to assess diastolic function by quantifying mitral inflow velocities (E and A), mitral annular velocities (e'), and left atrial volume (LAVi). Measurements by TTE and CMR were compared using regression. The diagnostic accuracy of CMR for DD was determined.CMR derived E, A, E/A, e' and E/e' all correlated moderately to strongly with TTE, and more strongly when comparing studies performed closer in time (E: r = 0.68, E deceleration time: r = 0.82, A: r = 0.78, e' r = 0.75, E/e': r = 0.80, p = 0.001; LAVi: r = 0.79, p < 0.001; E/A: r = 0.82, p < 0.001, n = 14 within 45 days). Using CMR criteria analogous to TTE, there was 82% (23/28) agreement regarding the presence of DD (95% CI [63 to 93%]), with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity, and 71% (20/28) agreement in the absolute DD grade.CMR can evaluate diastolic function, with overall strong agreement to TTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.