Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604834›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Physiological and molecular mechanisms of leaf response to high-temperature stress in high-temperature-resistant soybean varieties.

Jiajia Li, Xianguan Zhi, Haoran Chen, Linying Chen, Yun Lu, Wei Liao, Zhuo Tian, Meiyan Wu, Yajing Shan, Heng Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiajia Li *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xianguan Zhi *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Haoran Chen *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Linying ChenSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yun LuSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Wei LiaoSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Zhuo TianSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Meiyan WuSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yajing ShanSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Heng WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Long YanNational Soybean Improvement Center Shijiazhuang Sub-Center, Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050035, China.
Bingqiang LiuNational Soybean Improvement Center Shijiazhuang Sub-Center, Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050035, China. liubingqiang@aliyun.com.
Xiaobo WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China. wxbphd@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China,China 2021YFD1201603-4Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province 2208085MC61Natural Science Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province KJ2021A0200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing global limate warm, high temperature (HT) is one of limiting factors for soybean yield and quality. Exploring HT resistance-related functional genes and their corresponding molecular mechanisms is of great value. In our previous report, compared with HD14 (HT sensitive), JD21 is an HT-resistant variety, and further analysis of the transcriptome and proteome has revealed the HT tolerance mechanism of JD21 anthers. We found that compared with those of HD14 (28.72%), the leaves of JD21 also exhibited HT resistance, and the degree of leaf wilting in JD21 plants after HT stress treatment was 11.02%; however, the regulatory mechanism of the response of JD21 to HT stress is still unclear.

resultsIn this study, comparative transcriptome analysis of JD21 and HD14 soybean leaves after HT stress and field control plants was performed by RNA-seq analysis. The results showed that the number of upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in JD21 and HD14 was greater than the number of downregulated DEGs after HT stress, and the number of up- or down-regulated DEGs in JD21 was higher than those of HD14. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that many DEGs were involved in various molecular functions and metabolic pathways. QRT‒PCR analysis verified that the gene expression pattern results determined via RNA-seq was reliable. In addition, through analysis of gene expression level and conserved domain, 18 key candidate genes related to the response of soybean leaves to HT stress were screened.

conclusionsThis study systematically revealed the regulation mechanism of soybean leaves molecular transcription level by RNA-seq, and several key candidate DEGs (transcription factor, HSPs, HSFs, GmCYP78A6, etc.) involved in the response to HT stress were identified based on the bioinformatics analysis. The results provided a theoretical basis for studying the response mechanism of soybean leaves to HT stress.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGlycine maxPlant LeavesStress, PhysiologicalGene Expression ProfilingHot TemperaturePlant ProteinsTranscriptomePlant ProteinsConserved domain analysisHigh-temperature stressLeavesMolecular mechanismRNA-seqSoybean

Identifiers

PMID39604834
PMCPMC11600837

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.