Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605601›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Comparative analysis of spike-sorters in large-scale brainstem recordings.

Caitlynn C De Preter, Elizabeth M Leimer, Alex Sonneborn, Mary M Heinricher

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caitlynn C De PreterDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-5372
Elizabeth M LeimerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Alex SonnebornDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Mary M HeinricherDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Funding

Understanding multisensory hypersensitivity in chronic pain statesR37NS098660 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HEINRICHER, MARY MAGDALEN · 2017 to 2023
$2.6M
Direct and Indirect Nociceptive Inputs to Brainstem Pain-Modulating NeuronsF31DE030677 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DE PRETER, CAITLYNN · 2021 to 2024
$145k
NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE030677NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS098660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advancements in high-density multi-channel electrodes have made it possible to record large numbers of neurons from previously inaccessible regions. While the performance of automated spike-sorters has been assessed in recordings from cortex, dentate gyrus, and thalamus, the most effective and efficient approach for spike-sorting can depend on the target region due to differing morphological and physiological characteristics. We therefore assessed the performance of five commonly used sorting packages, Kilosort3, MountainSort5, Tridesclous, SpyKING CIRCUS, and IronClust, in recordings from the rostral ventromedial medulla, a region that has been characterized using single-electrode recordings but that is essentially unexplored at the high-density network level. As demonstrated in other brain regions, each sorter produced unique results. Manual curation preferentially eliminated units detected by only one sorter. Kilosort3 and IronClust required the least curation while maintaining the largest number of units, whereas SpyKING CIRCUS and MountainSort5 required substantial curation. Tridesclous consistently identified the smallest number of units. Nonetheless, all sorters successfully identified classically defined RVM physiological cell types. These findings suggest that while the level of manual curation needed may vary across sorters, each can extract meaningful data from this deep brainstem site.

Identifiers

PMID39605601
PMCPMC11601346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.