ReviewThe Ulster medical journal2024
Integration of genomic medicine to mainstream patient care within the UK National Health Service.
Review in The Ulster medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the path to clinical implementation of multi-omics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- A consensus model for implementation of genomics in Queensland Health - a Delphi study.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Preparedness for working with genomic medicine among Swedish non-genetics physicians - a nation-wide survey study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Determining the value of genomics in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- From tradition to transformation: evolving models of care in clinical genetics.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Genomic sequencing technologies for rare disease in mainstream healthcare: the current state of implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Academic and clinical perspectives of metagenome sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious disease: an interpretive phenomenological study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of genomic medicine within mainstream patient care promises advances in healthcare and potential benefits for disease prediction and personalised treatment approaches. This paper explores the challenges of integrating genomic medicine within the UK's National Health Service (NHS) and potential solutions for alignment with the NHS's proposed long-term plan and Genome UK strategy. Critical challenges and knowledge gaps have been identified, including a referral-dependent system, unclear eligibility criteria, lack of policies and guidelines, gaps in clinical genomic competence, genomic sequencing costs, equity issues for genomic testing access across the UK, and data management and patient privacy concerns. Proposed solutions and future directions include extending genetic test ordering authority to include mainstream clinicians and establishing unambiguous eligibility criteria, policies and guidelines through a developing trained workforce and appropriate patient engagement. Moreover, expanded Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and pharmacogenomic testing approaches through up-scaling genomic sequencing capacity and standardising genetic testing across the UK will lower consumable costs. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and data warehousing approaches will improve data management, particularly in the context of integration within electronic health records. In summary, the successful integration of genomic medicine within mainstream patient care holds transformative potential for healthcare provision. By recognising the challenges identified and embracing the proposed solutions, healthcare systems can revolutionise patient outcomes, advancing precision medicine and shaping the future of genomic-driven healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39606143PMC11591220What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.