ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Denoising diffusion model for increased performance of detecting structural heart disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence have shown promise in producing realistic images from complex data distributions. We developed a denoising diffusion probabilistic model trained on the CheXchoNet dataset, encoding the joint distribution of demographic data and echocardiogram measurements. We generated a synthetic dataset skewed towards younger patients with a higher prevalence of structural left ventricle disease. A diagnostic deep learning model trained on the synthetic dataset performed comparably to one trained on real data producing an AUROC=0.75(95%CI 0.72-0.77), with similar performance on an internal dataset. Combining real data with positive samples from the synthetic data improved diagnostic accuracy producing an AUROC=0.80(95%CI 0.78-0.82). Subgroup analysis showed the largest performance improvement across younger patients. These results suggest diffusion models can increase diagnostic accuracy and fine-tune models for specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.