ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Molecular convergence of risk variants for congenital heart defects leveraging a regulatory map of the human fetal heart.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital heart defects (CHD) arise in part due to inherited genetic variants that alter genes and noncoding regulatory elements in the human genome. These variants are thought to act during fetal development to influence the formation of different heart structures. However, identifying the genes, pathways, and cell types that mediate these effects has been challenging due to the immense diversity of cell types involved in heart development as well as the superimposed complexities of interpreting noncoding sequences. As such, understanding the molecular functions of both noncoding and coding variants remains paramount to our fundamental understanding of cardiac development and CHD. Here, we created a gene regulation map of the healthy human fetal heart across developmental time, and applied it to interpret the functions of variants associated with CHD and quantitative cardiac traits. We collected single-cell multiomic data from 734,000 single cells sampled from 41 fetal hearts spanning post-conception weeks 6 to 22, enabling the construction of gene regulation maps in 90 cardiac cell types and states, including rare populations of cardiac conduction cells. Through an unbiased analysis of all 90 cell types, we find that both rare coding variants associated with CHD and common noncoding variants associated with valve traits converge to affect valvular interstitial cells (VICs). VICs are enriched for high expression of known CHD genes previously identified through mapping of rare coding variants. Eight CHD genes, as well as other genes in similar molecular pathways, are linked to common noncoding variants associated with other valve diseases or traits via enhancers in VICs. In addition, certain common noncoding variants impact enhancers with activities highly specific to particular subanatomic structures in the heart, illuminating how such variants can impact specific aspects of heart structure and function. Together, these results implicate new enhancers, genes, and cell types in the genetic etiology of CHD, identify molecular convergence of common noncoding and rare coding variants on VICs, and suggest a more expansive view of the cell types instrumental in genetic risk for CHD, beyond the working cardiomyocyte. This regulatory map of the human fetal heart will provide a foundational resource for understanding cardiac development, interpreting genetic variants associated with heart disease, and discovering targets for cell-type specific therapies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.