Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606367›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models.

Chen Zhang, Lijun An, Naren Wulan, Kim-Ngan Nguyen, Csaba Orban, Pansheng Chen, Christopher Chen, Juan Helen Zhou, Keli Liu, B T Thomas Yeo

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chen ZhangCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-0047
Lijun AnCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-4625
Naren WulanCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0005-3974-7528
Kim-Ngan NguyenCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0004-5968-6307
Csaba OrbanCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9133-3561
Pansheng ChenCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0009-8881-8643
Christopher ChenMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-9225
Juan Helen ZhouCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0180-8648
Keli LiuCompany A, Berkeley, CA, USA.
B T Thomas YeoCentre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-3276

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
THE XNAT IMAGING INFORMATICS PLATFORMR01EB009352 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Scott Marcus · 2009 to 2026
$9.3M
Functional genomics of the human connectome in psychiatric illnessR01MH120080 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AVRAM J HOLMES, Thomas Boon Thye Yeo · 2019 to 2026
$4.8M
A mega-analysis framework for delineating autism neurosubtypesR01MH133334 · NIMH · CHILD MIND INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Adriana Di Martino · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
DRIVING PERFORMANCE IN PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER01AG043434 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROE, CATHERINE M · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043434NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009352NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120080NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurately predicting Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression is useful for clinical care. The 2019 TADPOLE (The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution) challenge evaluated 92 algorithms from 33 teams worldwide. Unlike typical clinical prediction studies, TADPOLE accommodates (1) variable number of observed timepoints across patients, (2) missing data across modalities and visits, and (3) prediction over an open-ended time horizon, which better reflects real-world data. However, TADPOLE only used the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, so how well top algorithms generalize to other cohorts remains unclear. Methods: We tested five algorithms in three external datasets covering 2,312 participants and 13,200 timepoints. The algorithms included FROG, the overall TADPOLE winner, which utilized a unique Longitudinal-to-Cross-sectional (L2C) transformation to convert variable-length longitudinal histories into feature vectors of the same length across participants (i.e., same-length feature vectors). We also considered two FROG variants. One variant unified all XGBoost models from the original FROG with a single feedforward neural network (FNN), which we referred to as L2C-FNN. We also included minimal recurrent neural networks (MinimalRNN), which was ranked second at publication time, as well as AD Course Map (AD-Map), which outperformed MinimalRNN at publication time. All five models - three FROG variants, MinimalRNN and AD-Map - were trained on ADNI and tested on the external datasets. Results: L2C-FNN performed the best overall. In the case of predicting cognition and ventricle volume, L2C-FNN and AD-Map were the best. For clinical diagnosis prediction, L2C-FNN was the best, while AD-Map was the worst. L2C-FNN also maintained its edge over other models, regardless of the number of observed timepoints, and regardless of the prediction horizon from 0 to 6 years into the future. Conclusions: L2C-FNN shows strong potential for both short-term and long-term dementia progression prediction. Pretrained ADNI models are available: https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/predict_phenotypes/Zhang2025_L2CFNN.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedomain generalizationfeature engineeringlongitudinal progression modellingrecurrent neural networksXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39606367
PMCPMC11601715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.