ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Accurately predicting Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression is useful for clinical care. The 2019 TADPOLE (The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution) challenge evaluated 92 algorithms from 33 teams worldwide. Unlike typical clinical prediction studies, TADPOLE accommodates (1) variable number of observed timepoints across patients, (2) missing data across modalities and visits, and (3) prediction over an open-ended time horizon, which better reflects real-world data. However, TADPOLE only used the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, so how well top algorithms generalize to other cohorts remains unclear. Methods: We tested five algorithms in three external datasets covering 2,312 participants and 13,200 timepoints. The algorithms included FROG, the overall TADPOLE winner, which utilized a unique Longitudinal-to-Cross-sectional (L2C) transformation to convert variable-length longitudinal histories into feature vectors of the same length across participants (i.e., same-length feature vectors). We also considered two FROG variants. One variant unified all XGBoost models from the original FROG with a single feedforward neural network (FNN), which we referred to as L2C-FNN. We also included minimal recurrent neural networks (MinimalRNN), which was ranked second at publication time, as well as AD Course Map (AD-Map), which outperformed MinimalRNN at publication time. All five models - three FROG variants, MinimalRNN and AD-Map - were trained on ADNI and tested on the external datasets. Results: L2C-FNN performed the best overall. In the case of predicting cognition and ventricle volume, L2C-FNN and AD-Map were the best. For clinical diagnosis prediction, L2C-FNN was the best, while AD-Map was the worst. L2C-FNN also maintained its edge over other models, regardless of the number of observed timepoints, and regardless of the prediction horizon from 0 to 6 years into the future. Conclusions: L2C-FNN shows strong potential for both short-term and long-term dementia progression prediction. Pretrained ADNI models are available: https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/predict_phenotypes/Zhang2025_L2CFNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.