ArticleCadernos de saude publica2024
[Analysis of the institutional capabilities of the Guatemalan Ministry of Health: democratic constraint, defunding, reforms, and model of care].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Guatemala is one of the Latin American countries with the greatest inequalities in access to health services, especially in primary health care. Multiple reforms have been proposed to solve accessibility problems but did not achieve the expected success, either for being isolated experiments or due to their interrupted implementation. Other associated factors are yet unknown, given the absence of a consolidated evaluation over time. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the gaps that affect the institutional environment of the Guatemalan Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance (MSPAS, acronym in Spanish). The theoretical framework of analysis of Institutional Capabilities was used to point out the main challenges to be faced by the institution in its macro- and micro-institutional environment. It is argued that the low institutional capability caused by the structural adequacy processes weakens the response capacity of the MSPAS to guarantee the right to health, which was evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Guatemala's macro-institutional environment limits the development of institutional capabilities due to the lack of a consolidated democratic tradition. Moreover, the State holds a poor capacity given the lack of a clear direction regarding its objectives, the lack of funding, and the biomedical-hegemonic approach of the care model that limits action from a health promotion approach. This article demonstrated the existence of limitations to the development of institutional capabilities and the importance of strengthening the field of health policies, planning, and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.