ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2024
Uncontrolled Cholesterol in Individuals with Severe Hypercholesterolemia in a Health Evaluation Program in Brazil.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brazilian Guideline on Dyslipidemias and Prevention of Atherosclerosis - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Adherence, Compliance and Persistency in High Cholesterol Treatment.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Detecting Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Adolescents: Universal Screening is Key.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with severe hypercholesterolemia (SH) are considered at high atherosclerosis risk and should be intensively treated with lipid-lowering drugs aiming for an LDL-C reduction of≥50% and a goal of <70 mg/dL.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate cholesterol control in individuals with SH (LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL or 160-189 mg/dL using lipid-lowering drugs) followed in a health evaluation program.
methods55,000 individuals were evaluated, of which 2,214 (4%) had SH, and 1,016 (45.8%) had repeated assessments. Achievement of recommended LDL-C goals was the primary study endpoint. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsMean age (± SD) was 44.9±8.8 years, 84.2% were men, and 0.5% reported previous myocardial infarction. Mean LDL-C was 203.0±22.0 mg/dL, and although 62.5% referred dyslipidemia, only 19% were using lipid-lowering drugs (5.9% in cases with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL). During a 4.1±2.8-year follow-up, use of lipid-lowering drugs increased from 18.1% to 48.4% (p<0.00001), 5.9% to 45.4% in those with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL (p< 0.00001) though 31% of cases with LDL-C 160-189 mg/dL stopped taking medications. Overall, there was a mean 26.7% reduction in LDL-C (p<0.0001), and LDL-C reductions ≥50% were attained in 19.2%, 19.1%, and 19.7 % of all individuals, and in those with LDL-C > 190 mg/dL and 160-189 mg/dL respectively. Only 3.1% reached LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (2.7% in those with LDL-C ≥ 190 and 5.3% in those with 160-189 mg/dL).
conclusionsA serious gap was found between treatment recommendations and reality in individuals at high atherosclerosis risk due to SH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.