Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607843›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Spinal V1 inhibitory interneuron clades differ in birthdate, projections to motoneurons, and heterogeneity.

Andrew E Worthy, Joanna T Anderson, Alicia R Lane, Laura J Gomez-Perez, Anthony A Wang, Ronald W Griffith, Andre F Rivard, Jay B Bikoff, Francisco J Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene expression programs underlying spinal commissural neuron differentiation and axon growth across the midline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. V2b Neurons Act via Multiple Targets to Produce in Phase Inhibition during Locomotion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew E WorthyDepartment of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-2675
Joanna T AndersonDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
Alicia R LaneDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-7559
Laura J Gomez-PerezDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
Anthony A WangDepartment of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
Ronald W GriffithDepartment of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
Andre F RivardDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
Jay B BikoffDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States.
Francisco J AlvarezDepartment of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-3244

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF SYNAPTIC INPUTS ON SPINAL INTERNEURONSR01NS047357 · NINDS · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALVAREZ, FRANCISCO J · 2004 to 2025
$6.4M
Interneuron circuits in the spinal motor systemR01NS123116 · NINDS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI BIKOFF, JAY BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIH HHS R01 NS047357NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047357NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord interneurons play critical roles shaping motor output, but their precise identity and connectivity remain unclear. Focusing on the V1 interneuron cardinal class we defined four major V1 subsets in the mouse according to neurogenesis, genetic lineage-tracing, synaptic output to motoneurons, and synaptic inputs from muscle afferents. Sequential neurogenesis delineates different V1 subsets: two early born (Renshaw and Pou6f2) and two late born (Foxp2 and Sp8). Early born Renshaw cells and late born Foxp2-V1 interneurons are tightly coupled to motoneurons, while early born Pou6f2-V1 and late born Sp8-V1 interneurons are not, indicating that timing of neurogenesis does not correlate with motoneuron targeting. V1 clades also differ in cell numbers and diversity. Lineage labeling shows that the Foxp2-V1 clade contains over half of all V1 interneurons, provides the largest inhibitory input to motoneuron cell bodies, and includes subgroups that differ in birthdate, location, and proprioceptive input. Notably, one Foxp2-V1 subgroup, defined by postnatal Otp expression, is positioned near the LMC and receives substantial input from proprioceptors, consistent with an involvement in reciprocal inhibitory pathways. Combined tracing of ankle flexor sensory afferents and interneurons monosynaptically connected to ankle extensors confirmed placement of Foxp2-V1 interneurons in reciprocal inhibitory pathways. Our results validate previously proposed V1 clades as unique functional subtypes that differ in circuit placement, with Foxp2-V1 cells forming the most heterogeneous subgroup. We discuss how V1 organizational diversity enables understanding of their roles in motor control, with implications for their diverse ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins.

Indexed as

InterneuronsMotor NeuronsNeurogenesisSpinal CordAnimalsForkhead Transcription FactorsMiceRenshaw CellsForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp2limb controlmotormouseneurosciencereciprocal inhibitionRenshaw cellspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID39607843
PMCPMC11604222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.