Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609283›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

3D full-dose brain-PET volume recovery from low-dose data through deep learning: quantitative assessment and clinical evaluation.

Rui Guo, Jiale Wang, Ying Miao, Xinyu Zhang, Song Xue, Yu Zhang, Kuangyu Shi, Biao Li, Guoyan Zheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui Guo *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiale Wang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying Miao *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xinyu ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Song XueDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kuangyu ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Biao LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. lb10363@rjh.com.cn.
Guoyan ZhengInstitute of Medical Robotics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. guoyan.zheng@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-0379

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82171975National Natural Science Foundation of China No. U20A20199Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai No. 23ZR1439600Shanghai Hospital Development Center Foundation No. SHDC22023201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLow-dose (LD) PET imaging would lead to reduced image quality and diagnostic efficacy. We propose a deep learning (DL) method to reduce radiotracer dosage for PET studies while maintaining diagnostic quality.

methodsThis retrospective study was performed on 456 participants respectively scanned by three different PET scanners with two different tracers. A DL method called spatially aware noise reduction network (SANR) was proposed to recover 3D full-dose (FD) PET volumes from LD data. The performance of SANR was compared with a 2D DL method taking regular FD PET volumes as the reference. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare the image quality metrics across different DL denoising methods. For clinical evaluation, two nuclear medicine physicians examined the recovered FD PET volumes using a 5-point grading scheme (5 = excellent) and gave a binary decision (negative or positive) for diagnostic quality assessment.

resultsStatistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in terms of image quality metrics when SANR was compared with the 2D DL method. For clinical evaluation, SANR achieved a lesion detection accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI: 90.1%, 100%), while the reference full-dose PET volumes obtained a lesion detection accuracy of 98.4% (95% CI: 95.4%, 100%). In Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, both the reference FD PET volumes and the FD PET volumes recovered by SANR exhibited the same accuracy.

conclusionCompared with reference FD PET, LD PET denoised by the proposed approach significantly reduced radiotracer dosage and showed noninferior diagnostic performance in brain lesion detection and Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Question The current trend in PET imaging is to reduce injected dosage, which leads to low-quality PET images and reduces diagnostic efficacy. Findings The proposed deep learning method could recover diagnostic quality PET images from data acquired with a markedly reduced radiotracer dosage. Clinical relevance The proposed method would enhance the utility of PET scanning at lower radiotracer dosage and inform future workflows for brain lesion detection and Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, especially for those patients who need multiple examinations.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsDeep learningDiagnosisLow-dosePositron emission tomographyRecovery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.