ArticleEuropean radiology2025
3D full-dose brain-PET volume recovery from low-dose data through deep learning: quantitative assessment and clinical evaluation.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress in medical imaging for intracranial aneurysms: technological advances in diagnosis, management, and clinical integration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLow-dose (LD) PET imaging would lead to reduced image quality and diagnostic efficacy. We propose a deep learning (DL) method to reduce radiotracer dosage for PET studies while maintaining diagnostic quality.
methodsThis retrospective study was performed on 456 participants respectively scanned by three different PET scanners with two different tracers. A DL method called spatially aware noise reduction network (SANR) was proposed to recover 3D full-dose (FD) PET volumes from LD data. The performance of SANR was compared with a 2D DL method taking regular FD PET volumes as the reference. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare the image quality metrics across different DL denoising methods. For clinical evaluation, two nuclear medicine physicians examined the recovered FD PET volumes using a 5-point grading scheme (5 = excellent) and gave a binary decision (negative or positive) for diagnostic quality assessment.
resultsStatistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in terms of image quality metrics when SANR was compared with the 2D DL method. For clinical evaluation, SANR achieved a lesion detection accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI: 90.1%, 100%), while the reference full-dose PET volumes obtained a lesion detection accuracy of 98.4% (95% CI: 95.4%, 100%). In Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, both the reference FD PET volumes and the FD PET volumes recovered by SANR exhibited the same accuracy.
conclusionCompared with reference FD PET, LD PET denoised by the proposed approach significantly reduced radiotracer dosage and showed noninferior diagnostic performance in brain lesion detection and Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Question The current trend in PET imaging is to reduce injected dosage, which leads to low-quality PET images and reduces diagnostic efficacy. Findings The proposed deep learning method could recover diagnostic quality PET images from data acquired with a markedly reduced radiotracer dosage. Clinical relevance The proposed method would enhance the utility of PET scanning at lower radiotracer dosage and inform future workflows for brain lesion detection and Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, especially for those patients who need multiple examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39609283What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.